Apathy is the most common behavioral change reported in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; Strong et al., 2017) and has been shown to have negative practical impact, such as caregiver burden (Burke et al., 2015).Apathy is a syndrome composed of different subtypes of demotivation (Radakovic & Abrahams, 2018).The dimensional apathy scale (DAS; Radakovic & Abrahams, 2014) is a … USA.gov. Method: 53 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients and 53 of their informants were recruited. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) is commonly used to study apathy in psychosis and has corresponding self-rated (AES-S) and clinician-rated (AES-C) versions. Objective: Apathy is composed of different demotivational subtypes measurable by the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS) and can be quickly assessed using the brief DAS (b-DAS). Three versions of the AES …  |  ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. Aim: Clinicians need an objective scale to measure apathy in patients with dementia. Reliability and validity of the Self-Report Version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale in First-Episode Psychosis: Concordance with the Clinical Version at Baseline and 12 Months Follow-up. Psychiatry Research 1991;38:143-162. Participants and Methods . The AES-C was developed using a translation and To date, no rating scales for detecting apathy in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients have been validated in Spanish. 2020 Dec 11;21(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04752-x. NIH Marin RS, Firinciogullari S, Biedrzycki RC. Psychiatry Research, This article presents evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). Conceptually, apathy is defined as lack of motivation not attributable to diminished level of consciousness, cognitive impairment, or emotional distress. Copyright © 1991 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-V. Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. Brain Injury 23(13-14): 999-1007. This article presents evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Conceptually, apathy is defined as lack of motivation not attributable to diminished level of consciousness, cognitive impairment, or emotional distress. Introduction. Marin, R. S., Biedrzycki, R. C., et al. Starkstein SE, Mayberg HS, Preziosi TJ, Andrezejewski P, Leiguarda R, Robinson RG. J Neuropsychiatry Cli Neurosci 1992;4;134-139. 4 However, the administration instructions and scoring method have suffered from a lack of standardisation. [The clinic of apathy in schizophrenia: a critical review of the issue]. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Medicine and Health Sciences Several types of validity evidence are presented for each version of the scale, including the following: ability of the AES to discriminate between groups according to mean levels of apathy, discriminability of apathy ratings from standard measures of depression and anxiety, convergent validity between the three versions of the scale, and predictive validity measures derived from observing subjects' play with novelty toys and videogames. However, different cutoff scores for the Apathy Evaluation Scale Informant version (AES-I), an international apathy scale, have been used in previous studies. Reliability, validity and clinical correlate of apathy in Parkinsons's disease. Multiple forms of reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater) were satisfactory. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. Raimo S, Trojano L, Spitaleri D, Petretta V, Grossi D, Santangelo G. J Neurol Sci. eCollection 2020. Objectives: Apathy is a very common symptom in institutionalized elderly and represents a condition of both clinical and public health importance. Int Psychogeriatr. The Apathy Evaluation Scale was developed by Robert S. Marin, M.D. The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Apathy Evaluation Scale and its Application in Patients with Schizophrenia. Regional White Matter Integrity Predicts Treatment Response to Escitalopram and Memantine in Geriatric Depression: A Pilot Study. 267, Issue. Intraclass correlations were used to determine inter-rater reliability. 2002 Dec;17(12):1099-105. doi: 10.1002/gps.755. Development and validation studies are described in RS Marin, RC Biedrzycki, S Firinciogullari: “Reliability and Validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale,” Psychiatry Research, 38:143-162, 1991 2014 Jun;40(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.05.002. 2 Department of Psychiatry, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea. Would you like email updates of new search results? Methods: Participants in this study were 198 patients with dementia resident in two hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The aim was to determine the reliability and validity of the b-DAS. Apathie (apathy evaluation scale) Évaluation. Marin RS , Biedrzycki RC , Firinciogullari S . Dissociable Motivational Deficits in Pre-manifest Huntington's Disease. The apathy evaluation scale (AES) proposed by Marin et al 4 is currently the scale most often used to assess apathy. Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov, Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus, Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/. DesRuisseaux LA, Williams VJ, McManus AJ, Gupta AS, Carlyle BC, Azami H, Gerber JA, Bolling AM, Cook CL, Betensky RA, Arnold SE. [ Links ] 13. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. Reliability of the Apathy Evaluation Scale in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1. Introduction . Radakovic R, Harley C, Abrahams S, Starr JM. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Method : 53 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients and 53 of their informants were recruited. 2015 Jun;27(6):903-23. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002221. 1991;38(2):143–62. Trials. 1993 May;28(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(93)90072-r. Yazbek H, Raffard S, Del-Monte J, Pupier F, Larue A, Boulenger JP, Gély-Nargeot MC, Capdevielle D. Encephale. , p. 140. "Measuring apathy after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale." The purpose of this study was to investigate the cutoff score, reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the AES-I (AES-I-J). J Psychosom Res. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool for characterizing, quantifying and differentiating apathy in various health conditions. Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and Apathy sub-scale of the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe-A) for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI).To identify an optimal cut-off score indicating presence of apathy according to the AES. Operationally, the AES treats apathy as a psychological dimension defined by simultaneous deficits in the overt behavioral, cognitive, and emotional concomitants of goal-directed behavior.  |  and convergent validity with self-rated anhedonia and observer-rated apathy Martin Bischof1*, Caitriona Obermann1, Matthias N. Hartmann1,2, Oliver M. Hager1,2, Matthias Kirschner1, Agne Kluge1, Gregory P. Strauss3 and Stefan Kaiser2 Abstract Background: Negative symptoms are considered core symptoms of schizophrenia. Author information: (1)Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les maladies neuromusculaires (GRIMN), CSSS de Jonquière, G7X 7X2 Saguenay, QC, Canada. Multiple forms of reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater) were satisfactory. Three versions of the AES (clinician, informant, and self-rated) were evaluated for 123 subjects, ages 53-85, meeting research criteria for right or left hemisphere stroke, probable Alzheimer's disease, major depression, or well elderly control. Graduate School. Cell Rep Med. 2020 Nov 30;1(9):100152. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100152. The AES-C has multiple forms that have has been shown to have good reliability and validity.6,16,18 Higher scores indicate higher levels of apathy, reflecting a lower level of motivation to get things done during the day. eCollection 2020. This article presents evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). Krause-Sorio B, Siddarth P, Milillo MM, Vlasova R, Ercoli L, Narr KL, Lavretsky H. Front Psychiatry. [16] Clarke DE , Ko JY , Kuhl EA , van Reekum R , Salvador R , Marin RS . (1991). Robert Marin (Université de Pittsburgh) définit l’apathie comme un syndrome clinique caractérisé par une réduction des comportements intentionnels en rapport avec un défaut de motivation. NLM 2020 Nov 17;11:548904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.548904. Gallais B(1)(2), Gagnon C(1)(2), Côté I(1)(2), Forgues G(1)(3), Laberge L(3)(4). 2014 Dec 15;347(1-2):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.027. Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? Epub 2013 Aug 16. 130 PD patients and 70 healthy controls were recruited to participate in the study. A review of the psychometric evidence. Find it on PubMed. However, different cutoff scores for the Apathy Evaluation Scale Informant version (AES-I), an international apathy scale, have been used in previous studies. Apathy in multiple sclerosis: a validation study of the apathy evaluation scale. Aim: Clinicians need an objective scale to measure apathy in patients with dementia. Operationally, the AES treats apathy as a psychological dimension defined by simultaneous deficits in the overt behavioral, cognitive, and emotional concomitants of goal-directed behavior. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 38, 101870. Operationally, the AES treats apathy as a psychological dimension defined by simultaneous deficits in the overt behavioral, cognitive, and emotional concomitants of goal-directed behavior. The aim of the present study was to determine the validity and reliability of the AES-S by investigating its concordance with the AES-C. Eighty-four first-episode (FEP) patients completed the shortened 12-item AES-S and AES-C at baseline … 1992 Spring;4(2):134-9 ( PubMed Abstract ) Member Access Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease. Likert scale from 1 (not at all characteristic) to 4 (very characteristic). For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate a Spanish version of Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) in a cohort of PD patients from Spain. Operationally, the AES treats apathy as a A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment. The sources of convergence between measures of apathy and depression. Reliability and validity of the self-report version of the apathy evaluation scale in first-episode Psychosis: Concordance with the clinical version at baseline and 12 months follow-up. 2019 Epub 2014 Oct 30. Assessing apathy in multiple sclerosis: Validation of the dimensional apathy scale and comparison with apathy evaluation scale. Guidelines for the administration of the AES are presented, along with suggestions for potential applications of the scale to clinical and research questions.  |  The aim was to determine the reliability and validity of the b-DAS. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Conceptually, apathy is defined as lack of motivation not attributable to diminished level of consciousness, cognitive impairment, or emotional distress. Rater 1 also administered four additional, established measures: the Apathy Evaluation Scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Index, and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. 2020 Dec 15;11:599365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599365. Robert PH, Clairet S, Benoit M, Koutaich J, Bertogliati C, Tible O, Caci H, Borg M, Brocker P, Bedoucha P. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. Atkins KJ, Andrews SC, Stout JC, Chong TT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale Short Form (K AES-10) for people with dementia. Psychiatry Res. Psychiatry Research, Vol. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment. Three versions of the AES … eihpark@gmail.com COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. 2011;70(1):73–97. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of apathy scales in neurodegenerative conditions. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool for characterizing, quantifying and differentiating apathy in various health conditions. The apathy inventory: assessment of apathy and awareness in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8. This article presents evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). OBJECTIVES Apathy is a very common symptom in the institutionalized elderly and represents a condition of both clinical and public health importance. Objective : Apathy is composed of different demotivational subtypes measurable by the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS) and can be quickly assessed using the brief DAS (b-DAS). Objective This study was designed to establish the validity and reliability of the apathy inventory (IA), a rating scale for global assessment of apathy and separate assessment of emotional blunting, lack of initiative, and lack of interest. HHS Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. We evaluated 115 subjects using Young Adults With Higher Motives and Expectancies of Regular Cannabis Use Show Poorer Psychosocial Functioning. BACKGROUND: Apathy, a prevalent and clinically relevant symptom in neurodegenerative disease, is often evaluated by the instrument Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). This article presents evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). Method Information for the IA can be obtained from the patient or from a caregiver. Its reliability and validity for measuring apathy in different pathological conditions have been demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cutoff score, reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the AES-I (AES-I-J). Three versions of the AES (clinician, informant, and self-rated) were evaluated for 123 subjects, ages 53–85, meeting research criteria for right or left hemisphere stroke, probable Alzheimer's disease, major depression, or well elderly control. However, this instrument has not been translated into Swedish, halting clinical and research efforts. An earlier version of this article was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, New York, NY, May 1990. Young Min Lee, Il Ho Park, Min Seong Koo, Seon Young Ko, Hyun Mook Kang, Jung Eun Song: 1 Department of Psychiatry, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea. Conceptually, apathy is defined as lack of motivation not attributable to diminished level of consciousness, cognitive impairment, or emotional distress. Several types of validity evidence are presented for each version of the scale, including the following: ability of the AES to discriminate between groups according to mean levels of apathy, discriminability of apathy ratings from standard measures of depression and anxiety, convergent validity between the three versions of the scale, and predictive validity measures derived from observing subjects' play with novelty toys and videogames. [ Links ] 12. This article presents evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES). J Affect Disord. Hauer K, Ullrich P, Heldmann P, Hummel S, Bauer JM, Werner C. BMC Geriatr. Operationally, the AES treats apathy as a psychological dimension defined by simultaneous deficits in the overt behavioral, cognitive, and emotional concomitants of goal-directed behavior. Guidelines for the administration of the AES are presented, along with suggestions for potential applications of the scale to clinical and research questions. Epub 2014 Oct 23. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. eCollection 2020 Dec 22. Conceptually, apathy is defined as lack of motivation not attributable to diminished level of consciousness, cognitive impairment, or emotional distress. The reliability and validity of this tool have been confirmed previously [11]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. The Apathy Evaluation Scale Informant-Japanese version (AES-I-J) was used to evaluate apathy. Amiet D, Youssef GJ, Hagg LJ, Lorenzetti V, Parkes L, Solowij N, Yücel M. Front Psychiatry. Lane-Brown, A. T. and Tate, R. L. (2009).